In a rapidly evolving informational landscape, the need for new structures and systems that recognize the inherent value and complexity of truth is paramount. As we communicate information, we must acknowledge the incompleteness of any single narrative and strive to foster an environment that encourages diverse perspectives and continuous learning. Here are some ideas for a new order that could facilitate this:

  1. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions: Inspired by historical models, these commissions could be established to address the spread of misinformation and promote healing in the information ecosystem. They would aim to uncover the truth, hold bad actors accountable, and educate the public on the importance of truthful communication.

  2. Information Ethics Councils: These councils could consist of experts from various fields, including philosophy, journalism, technology, and law. They would develop and promote ethical guidelines for information dissemination and provide a framework for evaluating the truthfulness of information.

  3. Digital Literacy Curriculum: A comprehensive digital literacy curriculum could be integrated into educational systems worldwide. This curriculum would teach individuals how to critically assess information, understand the ethical implications of sharing content, and engage in constructive dialogue.

  4. Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability: Tech companies would be required to disclose how their algorithms work and how they affect the spread of information. This transparency would allow for public scrutiny and ensure that algorithms do not inadvertently promote misinformation.

  5. Decentralized Information Networks: New systems could be developed that leverage blockchain and other decentralized technologies to create a more democratic and transparent information network. This would reduce the power of centralized platforms and allow for more equitable distribution of information.

  6. Peer-Review for Information: Similar to the scientific peer-review process, information could be vetted by a community of experts before it gains widespread dissemination. This would help ensure that information is reliable and accurate before it reaches a large audience.

  7. Truthfulness Incentives: Economic and social incentives could be created to reward truthful communication. This could include grants, awards, or recognition for individuals and organizations that consistently provide accurate information.

  8. Dialogue Platforms: New platforms could be designed to facilitate constructive dialogue and debate. These platforms would encourage users to engage with different perspectives and seek common ground, rather than retreating into echo chambers.

  9. Information Health Indicators: Metrics could be developed to measure the "health" of the information ecosystem. These indicators would track the prevalence of misinformation, the diversity of information sources, and the level of public engagement with complex issues.

  10. Global Information Treaty: An international treaty could be established to promote truthfulness in information and to combat misinformation. This treaty would set global standards and provide a framework for cross-border cooperation.

In this new order, the intention of our individual existence would be expressed through a commitment to truthfulness and ethical communication. We would recognize that truth is multifaceted and that our understanding is always evolving. By embracing this incompleteness, we can foster a culture of humility, curiosity, and respect for the truth in all its complexity.

Ultimately, the goal of these new structures and systems would be to create a more informed, resilient, and compassionate society. By valuing truth and understanding its nuances, we can better navigate the informational universe and work towards a more enlightened existence.


Recognizing the potential for Orwellian connotations when discussing the regulation of information is crucial, as it highlights the delicate balance between promoting truthfulness and preserving individual freedoms. The key to navigating this complex terrain lies in the intention behind the proposed structures and systems, as well as the outcomes they aim to achieve.

The intention should not be to restrict or control individuals but to create an environment that empowers them with accurate information and the tools to discern truth from falsehood. The goal is to liberate, not by imposing a singular narrative, but by fostering a pluralistic and informed society where individuals can make autonomous decisions based on a robust understanding of the world.

Here are some considerations to ensure that the new order promotes liberation and freedom:

  1. Transparency: Any system or structure designed to address information ethics should operate with full transparency. The processes, goals, and methods of these entities must be open to public scrutiny to prevent the misuse of power.

  2. Inclusivity: The development of new systems should involve a wide range of stakeholders, including representatives from different cultures, political perspectives, and social groups. This ensures that the solutions are inclusive and do not inadvertently favor one group over another.

  3. Education: A focus on education empowers individuals to think critically and make informed judgments about the information they encounter. This is a liberating force, as it equips people with the ability to navigate the information landscape without undue influence.

  4. Protection of Free Speech: Any measures taken to promote truthfulness must be carefully balanced with the protection of free speech. The goal is not to silence dissenting voices but to encourage open and honest discourse.

  5. Accountability: Those who create and disseminate misinformation should be held accountable, but this should be done through fair and just processes that respect due process and human rights.

  6. Technological Solutions: The use of technology should be aimed at enhancing the ability of individuals to access diverse sources of information and to verify the accuracy of that information. This includes the development of tools that help users fact-check and assess the credibility of sources.

  7. International Standards: The development of international standards and norms can help prevent the abuse of information control by any single nation or entity. These standards should be developed through a collaborative and democratic process.

  8. Continuous Evaluation: The effectiveness of new systems should be continuously evaluated, with mechanisms in place for feedback and adaptation. This ensures that the systems evolve in response to changing circumstances and do not become rigid or oppressive.

Language, indeed, can be a double-edged sword. Terms like "liberate" and "set free" can be misconstrued or co-opted to serve different agendas. Therefore, it is essential to use language carefully and to clarify the meanings and intentions behind the terms we employ. In the context of George Orwell's "1984," the novel serves as a stark warning about the dangers of totalitarianism and the manipulation of information. Orwell's dystopian vision was influenced by historical events and trends of his time, including the rise of fascism and Stalinism, the manipulation of truth during wartime, and the suppression of dissent and free thought.

Read more: Historical context